Tall Fescue, Endophytes and Alkaloids, and Fescue Toxicosis
Tall fescue (Schedonorus arundinaceus, syn. Lolium arundinaceum, formerly Festuca arundinacea) is the predominant forage species on over 1 million acres of hay and pastureland in Virginia and over 35 million acres across the U.S. Although it is known as a high-quality forage, tall fescue has been linked with livestock health issues and other disorders due to a fungus associated with the plant. Understanding this fungus can help producers develop whole-farm management strategies to mitigate its effects.
Tall Fescue Growth and Nutritive Value
A cool-season perennial grass, tall fescue is well adapted to most of Virginia’s soils and climate, and it is productive over much of the growing season. The forage has many desirable agronomic traits. It is relatively easy to establish, forms a dense sod under grazing, and persists under a wide range of environmental and management conditions. Tall fescue can tolerate drought, and on poor or hard-to-manage soils, it is the most reliable perennial cool-season grass for forage or conservation purposes. Tall fescue is a vigorous seed producer and strong competitor in mixed stands and thus tends to encroach over time until it becomes the dominant forage in a pasture. Its tendency for encroachment and survivability are evidenced by the fact that it was not planted on a widespread basis in the U.S. until the 1940s, but within a few decades it had become the dominant pasture grass in many Eastern states.
Tall fescue generally starts growth in late winter or early spring but it can remain green and continue growing throughout mild winters, particularly in warmer regions such as southeastern Virginia. As is typical for cool-season grasses, tall fescue has greatest growth rates during spring and fall (Figure 1.). Tall fescue leaves (and thus nutrient concentrations) hold up better to frost and freezes than other forages, making it superior to all other perennial cool-season grasses in its ability to be stockpiled for late fall and winter grazing. This characteristic makes tall fescue a key resource for livestock producers, as it enables them to increase grazing days (Allen et al. 1992) and dramatically reduce winter feeding costs.
Tall fescue forage is generally of high quality and digestibility. The species is nutritionally similar to other cool-season perennial grasses when grazed or harvested at a similar stage of growth. First-cutting tall fescue hay is frequently harvested when too mature, resulting in lower digestibility, energy, and protein content than desired. This problem can be addressed with sound management, however. High levels of sugars accumulate in tall fescue during the fall and early winter; this may be advantageous for fall- calving herds, which have high energy requirements during those months. It also has potential for summer stockpiling, particularly for brood cows. (See VCE publication CSES-201NP, “Using a Summer Stockpiling System to Extend the Grazing Season,” at https://pubs.ext.vt.edu/content/dam/pubs_ext_vt_edu/ CSES/cses-201/CSES-201NP.pdf. Related video resources can be found at https://pubs.ext.vt.edu/ANR/ ANR-289/ANR-289NP.html.)
Despite its positive agronomic traits, many Virginia producers are often disappointed with the performance of livestock grazing on tall fescue. Mid-summer gains are often inferior to gains of animals grazing other grass or grass-legume pastures. Milk production of lactating beef and dairy cows also is often reduced. In beef systems, this contributes to lower calf weaning weights. In addition, reductions in calving rates, particularly for spring-calving herds, can be attributed in part to tall fescue consumption.
Fungal Endophytes, Alkaloids, and Plant Performance
While poor performance and negative responses of animals consuming tall fescue were observed for several decades, it was not until the late 1970s that the cause of these responses was discovered. Many tall fescue plants are infected with a fungus, called an endophyte because it grows inside the plant (endo = within; phyte = plant). This fungal endophyte is now classified as Epichloë coenophialum (Figure 2). It does not affect the outward appearance of tall fescue. Epichloë fungi produce ergot alkaloids during their normal lifecycle within the plant. When consumed, these toxins cause a number of disorders for a variety of mammalian species; ergotism is the best known such disorder.
Although the phrase “endophyte infected” is typically used in a negative sense, the actual fungal endophytes are not toxic per se. The fungi produce several types of alkaloids that benefit the plant hosts. For example, peramine is an alkaloid that provides resistance to insect pests.
However, the wildtype endophytes also produce ergovaline, the primary ergot alkaloid that causes toxic effects to mammals. This molecule (Figure 3) is chemically similar to lysergic acid diethylamide, more typically known as LSD. Problems related to ergovaline consumption are discussed in the section on livestock disorders below.
The fungal endophyte resides in plant cell walls and has no reproductive cycle. During the winter, the fungus survives in living plants in crown tissues near ground level. To be transmitted from one generation to the next, the fungus grows into the seed. As fescue seed heads develop, the fungus grows from the base of the plant up the elongating stem and invades most of the developing seeds. Spreading through seed is the only known means of transmitting the fungus to the next generation. An uninfected tall fescue plant cannot “catch” the fungus from an infected plant. This knowledge is important for the management of tall fescue stands.
Infection of tall fescue by the endophyte is a good example of a symbiotic association in nature. The plant provides a home and energy for the endophyte, and the fungus in turn helps make the tall fescue plant more resistant to stress by generating alkaloids and altering plant root architecture. When infected with the endophyte, tall fescue has greater ability to withstand environmental stresses such as drought and low soil fertility. The endophyte also supports resistance to insects and other plant pests such as slugs and mites by deterring their feeding. Livestock grazing infected fescue also have lower intake, which may help prevent overgrazing. Although no clear evidence exists indicating that livestock can distinguish between infected and uninfected fescue, infected plants do have a competitive advantage in mixed pastures — particularly when overgrazed — because the stress tolerances conveyed by the endophyte support greater plant persistence. Thus, endophyte-free fescue and other grass species are more likely to die out over time.
The fungus itself typically is less present in leaf tissue, and alkaloid concentrations are several times higher in plant stems and stem bases than in leaves. This might suggest that maintaining tall fescue in a leafy, vegetative condition may reduce ingestion of toxins. However, such healthy, productive plants typically support fungal growth and have higher alkaloid concentrations.
Initial efforts at resolving fescue toxicosis issues involved removing the endophyte from tall fescue. The endophyte can be killed by treating plants with fungicide, or by storing the seed for over 12 months in sub-optimal conditions. Many studies show the performance benefits for animals that graze endophyte-free or low-endophyte tall fescue varieties. (Low endophyte varieties have seed containing less than 5 percent wildtype endophytes, and therefore very low or nonexistent alkaloid levels.) Livestock that graze endophyte-free pastures do not have negative responses (Table 1). However, these cultivars largely have proven unsuitable in Virginia, particularly in low management situations or under more challenging environments, because they lack persistence. Thus, subsequent efforts to reduce negative effects of infected fescue largely focused on diluting the pasture with legumes or feeding supplements, although this too has limitations.
Discovery of fungal endophyte strains that do not produce alkaloids prompted a new round of research and Extension efforts. These are often called “novel,” “nontoxic,” or “friendly” endophytes, and they produce little or no ergot alkaloid. Studies have shown that livestock grazing low- or nontoxic endophyte varieties show little or no fescue toxicosis symptoms. In addition, fescue varieties that contain novel endophytes have similar resistance to pests and challenging environmental conditions as Kentucky 31 and other cultivars with wildtype endophytes. Some producers have experienced loss of novel endophyte stands, this may reflect bad seed (without viable endophytes), bad management, or both.
Livestock Disorders from Endophyte-Infected Tall Fescue
“Fescue toxicosis” is the broad term that encompasses the three major disorders observed in cattle that consume tall fescue infected with the wildtype endophyte. Other ruminants also experience lower performance in response to alkaloid consumption, although the effects may be less obvious.
Symptoms of fescue toxicosis include:
Reduced feed intake
Low weight gains
Decreased milk production
Higher respiration rates
Elevated body temperatures
Rough hair coats
More time spent in/near water and shade
Less time spent grazing
Reduced blood serum prolactin levels
Reduced reproductive performance
Some or all of these symptoms can be observed in dairy cattle, beef cattle, and sheep that consume tall fescue pasture, green chop, hay, and/or seed containing ergot alkaloids. Symptoms are most noticeable when temperatures exceed 88 degrees F and generally are reduced in cooler weather (Hemken et al. 1981).
In cattle, the three disorders of fescue toxicosis include “summer slump,” “fescue foot,” and “bovine fat necrosis.” These disorders occur in part because ergot alkaloids are potent vasoconstrictors, meaning the alkaloids constrict (or reduce the size of) the animal’s blood vessels. This reduces blood circulation, especially to the extremities. Summer slump (or “summer syndrome”) reflects the lower-than-expected performance of cattle on tall fescue, particularly during summer. Because blood flow is constrained, these animals typically have a higher core body temperature and seek shade and water to dissipate heat. Reducing intake is another mechanism for reducing heat stress. This condition is further compounded because these animals often maintain a rough hair coat (Figure 4).
Fescue foot (Figure 5) generally describes lameness associated with alkaloid consumption. Empirical observations suggest these symptoms are most likely to occur with rapid drops in temperature in the fall, before the body has an opportunity to adjust to the change in weather. Animals with fescue foot may have redness of the coronary band, the junction of the hoof and the leg’s hairline. Changes in vein architecture also are associated with fescue foot. As this condition worsens, sores at the band will appear; in severe cases, gangrenous conditions will set in, causing sloughing of hooves or feet. Cattle can also lose the tips of tails (Figure 6), ears, or both because these extremities do not stay warm enough to prevent frostbite.
Bovine fat necrosis is characterized by the abnormal accumulation of masses of hard fat in the abdominal cavities of cattle. This fat can cause digestive or calving problems. Occurrence of fat necrosis is generally limited to cattle grazing pure tall fescue pastures that have been heavily fertilized with poultry litter or nitrogen fertilizer. Older cows may be more subject to this problem. Animals with little exposure to fescue also can develop fat necrosis when exposed to toxic pasture (Figure 7).
Effects on Beef Stockers
Research throughout the southeastern U.S. suggests that gains in yearling cattle are reduced by an average of 0.1 pounds per day with each 10 percent increase in the level of endophyte infection in a pasture, although in Virginia, the loss may not be that high. Historical data collected in Virginia (Table 1) suggest that losses may be closer to 0.04-0.06 pounds per day with each 10 percent increase in infection level. This may be a result of Virginia’s cooler climate compared to other southeastern states.
Even though fescue toxicosis is often referred to as summer syndrome, poor steer gains can occur throughout the season (Table 1). Nevertheless, the extent to which animal gain suffers usually increases as temperature increases, and observed increases in daytime temperatures in our region (EPA 2001) are likely to increase the severity of this problem.
Effects on Breeding Cattle
Cows grazing toxic, endophyte-infected tall fescue generally have reduced weight gain and lower pregnancy and calving rates (Table 2). Mortality for newborn calves can also occur when cows have little or no milk at freshening. Reduced milk production by the dam also lowers calf rates of gain and weaning weights. Gains and pregnancy rates of heifers decrease as toxic endophyte levels increase. Reductions in calving rates seem to be due to early embryonic death and a failure to conceive (which may be confounded by poor body condition and heat stress on toxic tall fescue). Estrus cycling may be affected by toxic tall fescue. Bulls also demonstrate lower reproductive performance after consumption of ergot alkaloids, possibly a result of reduced semen quality (Pratt et al. 2015).
Effects on Milk Production
Dry cows and pregnant dairy heifers grazing toxic, endophyte-infected tall fescue in late summer and fall can have reduced milk production after freshening. Reductions as great as 45 percent in beef cows, 50 percent in beef heifers, and 60 percent in dairy cows have been reported. This occurs due to reduced feed intake and prolactin (the hormone supporting milk production), and likely also due to a reduction in blood flow to the mammary gland (see Table 1).
|Location and Parameter||Low endophyte2||High endophyte3||Difference|
|ADG4 (Apr-July 1988-91)||1.88||1.48||27|
|ADG (July-Oct 1988-91)||0.92||0.74||24|
|ADG (Apr-Oct 1988-91)||1.37||1.10||25|
|ADG (Apr-Oct 1995-96)||1.30||0.93||40|
|Hair Coat Score5 (Oct 1988-91)||2.2||3.6||39|
|Southern Piedmont Virginia||lb/head/day||%|
|ADG (Apr-July 1988-91)||1.76||1.25||41|
|ADG (July-Oct 1988-91)||1.20||0.87||38|
|ADG (Apr-Oct 1988-91)||1.45||1.04||39|
|Hair Coat Score5 (Oct 1988-91)||2.2||3.6||39|
1 Sources: Tully et al. 1994 and Allen et al. 1997, 168-172.
2 < 5% endophyte-infected
3 > 70% endophyte-infected
4 ADG = Average Daily Gain
5 Hair Coat Score: 1 = smooth and shiny; 5 = rough and dirty
6 Although measured in stockers in this study, substantial prolactin depression occurs when lactating cows graze toxic fescue. This response indicates that lactating cows would produce less milk.
Influence of Cattle Breed on Response to Toxic Fescue
Although Angus and Brahman-Angus cross steers both exhibit decreased gains when grazing infected tall fescue, the magnitude of the decrease may be less for the Brahman-cross steers. Brahman cattle are inherently more heat tolerant, and so they may be better adapted to resist or tolerate the higher body temperatures associated with consuming toxic tall fescue in hot weather. However, with the heavy discounts for Brahman cross cattle in Virginia, cross breeding with Brahman cattle is not recommended. Other European breeds may have more resistance to heat stress than traditional British breeds and thus perform better when consuming ergot alkaloids.
Variability in the resistance of individual cattle to ergot alkaloids also exists within breeds. A number of genes have been correlated with greater calf performance from dams that routinely graze toxic tall fescue. For example, the ability to shed hair is associated with greater productivity on toxic tall fescue, and hair coat scores may be useful to distinguish resistant from nonresistant cattle. Some have observed that cows that slick off earlier typically wean heavier calves, and this trait appears to be moderately heritable. Producers likely have been selecting (if subconsciously) for more tolerant cattle over many generations. Of course, not bringing home a calf puts added selection pressure on cows that are sensitive to the alkaloids.
Newly available genetic tests can be used to determine whether individual cattle have genes associated with fescue tolerance. As with all genetic tests, these should not be used exclusively when making decisions for the genetic makeup of a herd but should be used as an additional selection criterion along with other genetic tests. No cattle have been found that are completely resistant to ergot alkaloids, and animal selection for greater tolerance to ergot alkaloids is only one management tool for improving productivity of herds on toxic tall fescue. Current efforts in Angus breeding include the development of fescue EPDs (expected progeny differences) to identify bulls with beneficial genetic traits related to fescue tolerance. While not yet available, those who purchase semen for artificial insemination would be well advised to choose bulls whose lineage traces to the Southeast.
|Type of Alternative Forage|
|Schmidt et al. 1986||55||96||low endophyte|
|Beers and Piper 1987||80||90||low endophyte|
|Gay et al. 1988||55||95||endophyte-free|
|Peters et al. 1992||72||91||endophyte-free|
|Essig et al. 1993||58||88||endophyte-free|
|Brown et al. 2000||56||93||bermudagrass|
|Burke et al. 2001||85||85||endophyte-free|
|Watson et al. 2004||94||94||novel endophyte|
|Coblentz et al. 2006||87||83||endophyte-free, orchardgrass|
|Coffey et al. 2007||45||85||novel endophyte|
|Drewnoski et al. 2009||54||65||novel endophyte, endophyte-free|
|Looper et al. 2010||61||84||bermudagrass during breeding|
|Caldwell et al. 2013||44||80||novel endophyte|
|Caldwell et al. 2013||90||95||novel endophyte during breeding|
Effects on Small Ruminants
Small ruminants are also susceptible to ergot alkaloids in similar ways, although they may be better able than cattle to detoxify them. Some research indicates that small ruminants can eliminate ergot alkaloids from their body faster than cattle. Weight gains of lambs consuming toxic tall fescue are often diminished due to reduced dry matter intake and digestibility. Growing kids also seem to be negatively affected by ergot alkaloids, but less work has been done with goats. Although ergot alkaloids cause vasoconstriction in small ruminants, the effects may be mitigated to some degree by the tolerance of some breeds to heat stress. Very little work has been done on the reproductive performance of small ruminants on toxic tall fescue, but ewes fed toxic tall fescue seed during gestation delivered much smaller lambs than ewes fed endophyte-free tall fescue seed.
Effects on Horses
Mares grazing endophyte-infected tall fescue pasture have lower conception rates, increased embryonic mortality, and increased abortions, resulting in fewer live foals. Pregnant mares are most sensitive to infected tall fescue during the last three months of gestation, and especially during the last 30 days; negative responses can occur even in the presence of low ergot alkaloid levels. For live foals, gestation lengths and weights can be greater, which can increase the difficulty of foaling (dystocia) and increase foal and mare deaths. Placentas, which often are retained, can be thicker and difficult for foals to shed. Because foals in turn may be weak at birth, this can further increase their mortality. Mares can have lower blood prolactin levels which may cause agalactia (no milk production). Lactating mares placed on infected tall fescue pastures have been known to stop lactating within a few days. Many of the symptoms associated with fescue toxicosis in pregnant and early-lactation mares can be treated with domperidone under veterinary supervision. There is no firm evidence that any other class of horse is adversely affected by toxic tall fescue pasture. In fact, in most areas of Virginia, endophyte-infected tall fescue is probably one of the best, most durable forages for horse pasture. For more details on managing fescue problems with horses, see VCE publication 406-475, “Broodmares Grazing Tall Fescue Pastures or Fed Tall Fescue Hay Require Careful Management and Close Observation,” at http://archive.li/cOBC5.
Extent of Endophyte Infection and Alkaloid Levels in Virginia Pastures
Sampling in the 1980s revealed that 75 percent of fields surveyed had fungus present in 50 percent or more of the plants. More recent research by Extension agents across Virginia suggests current infection levels may be higher than in the 1980s. Of pastures sampled, 100 percent were infected with the toxic endophyte, and 80 percent of pasture samples had infection levels of 70 percent or more. Infection levels of 40 percent or more can generally be expected to produce moderate to severe adverse effects in animals, although no level of infection can be considered completely safe.
Information on sampling tall fescue pastures can be found in VCE publication SPES-21P, “Sampling Tall Fescue for Endophyte Infection and Ergot Alkaloid Concentration,” at https://pubs.ext.vt.edu/content/ dam/pubs_ext_vt_edu/spes/spes-21/SPES-21.pdf. Quantifying endophyte infection levels in toxic fescue pastures is a “first pass” strategy for assessing potential for toxicosis issues on the farm. However, knowing levels of infection is not the same as knowing the level of alkaloids present in a pasture. Scientists have not reached universal consensus on what levels are toxic to livestock, but many place the threshold for disorders at about 400 parts per billion. Alkaloid levels in recent sampling efforts around the state averaged 1,543 ppb total ergot alkaloids, and in one case was 3,071 ppb, well over a 400-ppb threshold.
Tall fescue is a productive, nutritious forage and the backbone of Virginia’s pasture systems. However, the plant typically contains alkaloids produced by a fungal endophyte, and these toxins cause numerous problems collectively known as fescue toxicosis. In cattle, physiological conditions associated with alkaloid consumption include fescue foot, summer slump, and bovine fat necrosis. Alkaloids also cause reductions in milk production and can lower reproductive success. Horses should be moved from toxic-laden fescue in late gestation to reduce the risk for lower milk production at foaling. Sampling in Virginia suggests typical alkaloid levels in pastures are greater than the presumed 400 ppb-threshold that causes clinical symptoms of fescue toxicosis in cattle. Sampling may be the first step in understanding the level of severity in your pastures. Whole-farm management strategies should be developed to deal with fescue toxicosis issues. Considerations should be made about how to manage pastures and conserved forages, nutrient source and application rates, and livestock selection and production, among other factors. Information on these topics can be found in related VCE publications.
Allen, V. G., J. P. Fontenot, C. P. Bagley, R. L. Ivy, and R. R. Evans. 1997. “Effects of Seaweed Treatments of Tall Fescue on Grazing Steers.” In Proceedings of the 1997 American Forage and Grassland Council, 168-172.
Allen, V. G., J. P. Fontenot, D. R. Notter, and R. C. Hammes Jr. 1992. “Forage Systems for Beef Production from Conception to Slaughter: I. Cow- calf Production.” Journal of Animal Science 70: 576-587.
Beers, K. W., and E.L. Piper. 1987. “Effects of Grazing Endophyte Infected Fescue on Heifers Growth, Calving Rate and Calf Birth Weight of First Calf Heifers.” Arkansas Farm Research 36: 7.
Brown, M. A., A. H. Brown, W. G. Jackson, and J. R. Miesner. 2000. “Genotype x Environment Interactions in Angus, Brahman, and Reciprocal- cross Cows and Their Calves Grazing Common Bermudagrass, Endophyte-infected Tall Fescue Pastures, or Both Forages.” Journal of Animal Science 78: 546-551.
Burke, J. M., R. W. Rorie, E. L. Piper, and W. G. Jackson. 2001. “Reproductive Responses to Grazing Endophyte-infected Tall Fescue by Postpartum Beef Cows.” Theriogenology 56: 357-369.
Caldwell, J. D., K. P. Coffey, J. A. Jennings, D. Philipp, A. N. Young, J. D. Tucker, D. S. Hubbell III, T. Hess, M. L. Looper, C. P. West, M. C. Savin, M. P. Popp, D. L. Kreider, D. M. Hallford, and C. F. Rosenkrans Jr. 2013. “Performance by Spring and Fall-calving Cows Grazing with Full, Limited, or No Access to Toxic Neotyphodium coenophialum- infected Tall Fescue.” Journal of Animal Science 91: 465-476.
Coblentz, W. K., K. P. Coffey, T. F. Smith, D. S. Hubbell III, D. A. Scarbrough, J. B. Humphry, B. C. McGinley, J. E. Turner, J. A. Jennings, C. P. West, M. P. Popp, D. H. Hellwig, D. L. Kreider, and C. F. Rosenkrans Jr. 2006. “Using Orchardgrass and Endophyte-free Fescue versus Endophyte-infected Fescue Overseeded on Bermudagrass for Cow Herds: II. Four-year Summary of Cow-calf Performance.” Crop Science 46: 1929-1938.
Coffey, K. P., W. K. Coblentz, J. D. Caldwell, C. P. West, R. K. Ogden, T. Hess, D. S. Hubbell III, M. S. Akins, and C. F. Rosenkrans Jr. 2007. “Cow and Calf Performance While Grazing Tall Fescue Pastures with Either the Wild-type Toxic Endophyte or a Non-toxic Novel Endophyte.” Arkansas Animal Science Report Series 553: 67-69. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Cow-and-Calf-Performance-While-Grazing-Tall-Fescue-Ogden-Coffey/944e30499c152166a3e54f5ec04c8d7b69f12809.
Drewnoski, M. E., E. J. Oliphant, M. H. Poore, J. T. Green, and M. E. Hockett. 2009. “Growth and Reproductive Performance of Beef Heifers Grazing Endophyte-free, Endophyte-infected and Novel Endophyte-infected Tall Fescue.” Livestock Science 125: 254-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. livsci.2009.05.003.
EPA 2001. How Will Climate Change Affect the Mid-Atlantic Region? EPA/903/F-00/002. Available at https://oaspub.epa.gov/eims/eimscomm. getfile?p_download_id=4011.
Essig, H. W., B. Aremu, C. E. Cantrell, M. E. Boyd, F. T. Withers Jr., T. W. White, and F. K. Brazle. 1993. “Impacts of Endophyte-infected Fescue on Cow/calf Production.” The Professional Animal Scientist 9: 64-69.
Gay, N., J. A. Boling, R. Dew, and D. E. Miksch. 1988. “Effects of endophyte-infected Tall Fescue on Beef Cow-calf Performance.” Applied Agricultural Research 3: 182.
Hemken, R. W., Boling, J. A., Bull, L. S., Hatton, R. H., Buckner, R. C., and Bush, L. P. 1981. “Interaction of Environmental Temperature and Anti- Quality Factors on the Severity of Summer Fescue Toxicosis.” Journal of Animal Science 52: 710-714.
Looper, M. L., S. T. Reiter, B. C. Williamson, M. A. Sales, D. M. Hallford, and C. F. Rosenkrans Jr. 2010. “Effects of Body Condition on Measures of Intramuscular and Rump Fat, Endocrine Factors, and Calving Rate of Beef Cows Grazing Common Bermudagrass or Endophyte-infected Tall Fescue.” Journal of Animal Science 88: 4133-4141.
Peters, C. W., K. N. Grigsby, C. G. Aldrich, J. A. Paterson, R. J. Lipsey, M. S. Kerley, and G. B. Garner. 1992. “Performance, Forage Utilization, and Ergovaline Consumption by Beef Cows Grazing Endophyte Fungus-infected Tall Fescue, Endophyte Fungus-free Tall Fescue, or Orchardgrass Pastures.” Journal of Animal Science 70: 1550-1561.
Pratt, S. L., H. H. Stowe, B.K. Whitlock, L. Strickland, M. Miller, S. M. Calcatera, M. D. Dimmick, G. E. Aiken, F. N. Schrick, N. M. Long, S. K., Duckett, and J. G. Andrae. 2015. “Bulls Grazing Kentucky 31 Tall Fescue Exhibit Impaired Growth, Semen Quality, and Decreased Semen Freezing Potential.” Theriogenology 83: 408-414.
Schmidt, S. P., D. A. Danielson, J. A. Holliman, H. W. Grimes, and W. B. Webster. 1986. “Fescue Fungus Suppresses Growth and Reproduction in Replacement Beef Heifers.” Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station Highlights of Agricultural Research 33: 15.
Tully, J., J. P. Fontenot, V. G. Allen, R. A. Brock, and N. B. Frank. 1994. “Grazing Low and High Endophyte Infected Fescue With and Without Clover by Cattle and Subsequent Feedlot Performance.” In Virginia Tech Livestock and Poultry Research Report, 1992-94. p.5.
Watson, R.H., M. A. McCann, J. A. Parish, J. H. Bouton, C. S. Hoveland, and F. N. Thompson. 2004. “Productivity of Cow-calf Pairs Grazing Tall Fescue Pastures Infected With Either the Wild-type Endophyte or a Nonergot Alkaloid-producing Endophyte Strain, AAR542.” Journal of Animal Science 82: 3388-3393.
Virginia Cooperative Extension materials are available for public use, reprint, or citation without further permission, provided the use includes credit to the author and to Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, and Virginia State University.
Virginia Cooperative Extension is a partnership of Virginia Tech, Virginia State University, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and local governments. Its programs and employment are open to all, regardless of age, color, disability, sex (including pregnancy), gender, gender identity, gender expression, national origin, political affiliation, race, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, military status, or any other basis protected by law
April 12, 2019