ID

Authors as Published

Christina Petersson-Wolfe, Extension Dairy Scientist, Milk Quality & Milking Management, cspw@vt.edu

Milking equipment function can have a profound negative impact on teat end health and overall milk quality. On the flip side, if we properly maintain equipment function we can positively impact the bottom line, udder and teat health, bulk tank somatic cell count and ultimately milk quality. It is important to remember that the goal of milking is to harvest as much milk as possible as efficiently as possible. However, this is a careful balancing act between efficiency and teat end health. Vacuum improperly set may have a negative effect on udder and teat health, but when properly balanced with pulsation, we can optimize milk harvest while minimizing the damage.

Vacuum level at the teat end may be considerably different from that at the pump. The difference is dependent on a variety of factors including restrictions in general from milk line sizes, milk tube sizes, milk flow sensors and volume of milk flow itself. Pump capacity and system airflow efficiency may also play a factor but the parameters mentioned above play the largest roles. Ultimately, it is the vacuum level at the cow and not system vacuum level that impact udder health. A vacuum level that is below optimal conditions will result in longer milk-out times, reduced harvest and poor parlor efficiency, and the potential for damaged teat tissue. Conversely, vacuum levels higher than optimal (which is more likely the case) have the ability to cause edema in the teat tissue and hyperkeratosis, poor milk out and in turn, an increase in the bulk tank somatic cell count and the potential for reduced udder health and milk quality. The optimal teat end vacuum level at peak milk flow will vary with inflation, but in general, will range from 10.5”-12.5” Hg. Your equipment dealer should provide the appropriate information for the particular liner in use on your operation.

Pulsators will easily become dirty and air inlets can become plugged. Also, the wear of various pulsator components may ultimately have a negative effect on performance. If not properly cleaned and maintained, this will impact the function of the pulsators. Improperly functioning pulsators can result in suboptimal massage and reduced teat and teat end health resulting in poor milk out and performance. The pulsator ratio should approximately be 60:40 to 65:35 and in some cases 70:30.

A full parlor evaluation should be done twice yearly. This includes testing all pulsators, teat end vacuum at peak milk flow, system vacuum in several locations and air flow capacity. Any components not performing properly should be fixed or replaced. The efficiency of various components of a milking system should also be evaluated. As you may know, a large part of the Southeast Quality Milk Initiative was to evaluate milking equipment function on 96 dairies in VA. Although we have completed that portion of the study, if you have questions or are in need of help, please do not hesitate to contact us (milk@vt.edu; 540-231-4767).


Virginia Cooperative Extension materials are available for public use, reprint, or citation without further permission, provided the use includes credit to the author and to Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, and Virginia State University.

Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia State University, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating. Edwin J. Jones, Director, Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg; M. Ray McKinnie, Administrator, 1890 Extension Program, Virginia State University, Petersburg.

Publication Date

September 9, 2016

Other resources in:

Other resources by:

Other resources from:

Articles in this Issue: