What do you need?

Use the search below to search the site or find your local unit office.

Return to Skip Menu

Main Content

Diamondback Moth in Virginia

ID

444-007

Authors as Published

Roberto J. Cordero, Graduate Student and Thomas P. Kuhar, Assistant Professor of Entomology, Department of Entomology, Eastern Shore AREC; Virginia Tech.

Introduction

The Diamondback moth (DBM), Plutella xylostella (L.), is considered to be the most destructive insect pest of crucifer crops worldwide. DBM larvae feed on leaves of crucifer crops such as cabbage, broccoli, cauliflower, collards, kale, kohlrabi, Chinese cabbage, and Brussels sprouts. All plant growth stages from seedling to head are susceptible to attack. DBM larvae can reach high densities and cause substantial defoliation as well as contamination and malformation of heads in cabbage, broccoli, and cauliflower. The absence and reduction of effective natural enemies, especially parasitoids, as well as insecticide resistance, contribute to the status of DBM as a pest.

 

    diamondback.jpg

Identification

Egg. Eggs are oval, somewhat flattened, approximately 0.4 mm long, 0.2 mm wide, and yellow to pale green. They typically are deposited singly or in small groups of two to eight eggs on leaves or other parts of the plant (Fig. 1). The junction of leaf veins on the upper surface of leaves tends to be an attractive oviposition site. Eggs hatch in approximately five to six days under normal field conditions.

   

figure1.jpg Fig. 1. Diamondback moth eggs.


Larva. Larvae develop through four instars and typically require from nine to 30 days to complete development. The early instars are tiny, colorless to yellow, and have a dark head capsule (Fig. 2). Midto later instars are green (Fig. 3). The body bears relatively few hairs. When disturbed, larvae often wriggle violently moving backward and spin down from the plant on a strand of silk.

   

figure2.jpg Fig. 2. Diamondback moth neonate larva

 

   

figure3.jpg Fig. 3. Diamondback moth neonate late-stage larva.

 

Pupa. Pupation occurs in a loose silk cocoon usually formed on the lower or outer leaves. The pupa is yellow to green and approximately 7 to 9 mm long. The pupal stage requires from five to 15 days to complete development (Fig. 4).

   

figure4.jpg Fig. 4. Diamondback moth pupa.

 

Adult. The DBM adult is a 6 mm long, slender, grayish-brown moth with pronounced antennae (Fig. 5). The moth is marked with a broad cream or light-brown band along its back that is sometimes constricted to form one or more light-colored diamonds on the back, which is the basis for the common name of this moth. Adults can live for seven or eight weeks, but the usual life span is around two weeks. Mating occurs on the day of emergence. A single female usually lays from18 to 356 eggs.

   

figure5.jpg Fig. 5. Diamondback moth adult.

 

Natural Control

A high percentage of DBM are killed during periods of heavy precipitation from disease and dislodging from the plant. Predators, entomopathogens, and parasitoids attack all stages of DBM. Predator species include: ladybug larvae and adults, spiders, predatory bugs, and lacewing larvae. Two parasitic wasps, Diadegma insulare (Fig. 6) and Oomyzus sokolowskii (Fig. 7) are the two most important species attacking DBM larvae in Virginia. The D. insulare cocoon appears in the silken cocoon of DBM, but is black compared with the DBM cocoon, which is green or yellow.

   

figure6.jpg Fig. 6. Diadegma insulare, a parasitoid of DBM larvae.

 

   

figure7.jpg Fig. 7. Oomyzus sokolowskii, a parasitoid of DBM larvae.

 

Monitoring

Sampling usually involves visually inspecting plants for DBM and other lepidopteran larvae. It is recommended to sample approximately 50 plants per field once or twice a week. A control measure is recommended if 20 percent or more of the plants are infested by DBM or other lepidopteran larvae. For cabbage and broccoli, once the head is formed, a control measure is recommended if 5 percent or more of the plants are infested.

Chemical Control

In recent years, DBM has developed resistance to many different insecticides, depending on the region. In Virginia, DBM has tolerance to insecticides in the carbamate, organophosphate, and pyrethroid classes. Numerous other more lepidopteran-specific insecticides are available that effectively control DBM and other lepidopteran pests in crucifers. Among these insecticides are Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) formulations, spinosad, indoxacarb, methoxyfenozide, tebufenozide, and avermectins. Rotation of insecticide groups and the use of the aforementioned narrowspectrum insecticides are suggested to reduce resistance and to conserve natural enemies. Consult the current edition of the Commercial Vegetable Production Recommendations, Virginia Cooperative Extension publication 456-020, for specific information on insecticides recommended for control of DBM in crucifer crops. The addition of a spreadersticker in the spray improves control.

References

Capinera, J.L. 2001. Handbook of Vegetable Pests. Academic Press. 729 pp.

Commercial Vegetable Production Recommendations. 2004. Virginia Cooperative Extension publication 456-420.

Harcourt, D.G. 1957. Biology of the diamondback moth, Plutella maculipennis (Curt.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), in eastern Ontario. II. Life-history, behavior, and host relationships. Canadian. Entomology. 89: 554-64.

Talekar, N.S. and A.S. Shelton. 1993. Biology, Ecology and Management of Diamondback Moth. Annual Review of Entomology. 38: 275-301.

 

Reviewed by Tom Kuhar, associate professor, Eastern Shore Agricultural Research and Extension Center

Rights


Virginia Cooperative Extension materials are available for public use, re-print, or citation without further permission, provided the use includes credit to the author and to Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, and Virginia State University.

Publisher

Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia State University, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating. Alan L. Grant, Dean, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences; Edwin J. Jones, Director, Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg; Jewel E. Hairston, Administrator, 1890 Extension Program, Virginia State, Petersburg.

Date

May 1, 2009