"Liming," as the word suggests, is the addition of limestone (calcite), primarily calcium carbonate (CaCO3), to neutralize acid waters and soils and buffer them from rapid fluctuations in pH. Limestone typically is applied to lawns, gardens, pastures, and croplands to supply calcium, an essential plant nutrient, and to decrease soil acidity.
Limestone can also be applied to lakes, ponds, and their surrounding watersheds to protect them from acidification, to add calcium, and to restore their important ecological, economic, and recreational values. Adding limestone to maintain a near-neutral pH (pH 7) keeps lake and pond water safe for aquatic life.
The pH of water is an expression of its acid or base content. The pH scale ranges from 0 (very acidic) to 14 (very basic). For example, battery acid has a pH below 1, and lye has a pH above 13; both are very caustic compounds, harmful to human and aquatic life.
Water with a pH reading of 0 to 6.9 is acidic; that with a pH of 7.1 to 14 is basic (alkaline). Most natural lake waters range from 6 to 9 in pH and are slightly basic due to the presence of carbonates and bicarbonates. Fish production generally is higher in alkaline (pH 7.1-9) waters.
The alkalinity of water refers to its capacity to neutralize acids or to resist changes in pH. Alkalinity is a measure of the concentrations of three basic ions: carbonates (CO3), bicarbonates (HCO3), and hydroxides (OH) in water expressed as mg/L equivalents of calcium carbonate. In general, soft waters with low alkalinities (< 30 mg/L) contain few basic ions, have a low buffering capacity to resist pH fluctuations, and are more susceptible to acidification. Hard waters usually have high alkalinities (>100 mg/L), many basic ions, a high buffering capacity, and are less sensitive to acidification.
Liming is one of the most cost-effective methods of slowing the effects of acidification, restoring acidic waters, and enhancing the abundance and diversity of aquatic life. It also reduces the toxic effects of metals, especially aluminum, copper, cadmium, lead, nickel, and zinc, which can threaten fish, other aquatic life, and human health.
Very acid lakes (i.e., pH below 4) often are devoid of fish, frogs, salamanders, crayfish, insects, and plankton. Certain sportfish, such as striped bass and salmonids, are sensitive to changes in pH and prefer lake waters with pH values ranging from 7 to 9. Because very acidic surface waters can have toxic concentrations of aluminum in solution, aquatic animals may be subjected to a potentially lethal double dose of poisonous acid and metals.
By neutralizing acid waters and reducing toxic dissolved metals, liming can improve reproduction and survival of aquatic life and promote healthy, balanced fish populations. The calcium in lime dissolved in water is absorbed and used by mussels and crayfish to develop their protective shells and by young and adult fish for scale formation, bone development, and growth.
Liming benefits sport fish populations in many ways. Liming improves overall water quality and fish health in acidified lakes and ponds. Fish in acidic waters are stressed, have lower resistance to disease, and grow more slowly to a smaller maximum size than fish in alkaline lakes. High acidity and toxic metals kill fish eggs and larvae and reduce spawning success. Liming can neutralize acidic waters, minimize stress, and detoxify heavy metals.
Liming enriches a lake by adding calcium, an important nutrient, and releasing phosphorus, another important nutrient, from the lake bottom muds. Production within the entire food chain (plankton-insects-fish) is stimulated by liming, and the increased abundance of natural food items supports sport fish growth and reproduction. Enhanced growth of rooted aquatic plants that serve as nursery areas for young sport fish can result from liming.
Make sure that acidification is the problem before adding lime. Symptoms similar to acidification may result from other problems. For example, poor fishing or declining numbers of fish may result from overfishing rather than poor reproduction caused by acid water.
Liming alkaline waters is unnecessary. Test the pH at different times of the day over several weeks to reliably determine the range of pH values. Generally, if the lake is an acidic or soft-water system with pH values less than 6.5 (and acid neutralizing capacity less than 50 microequivalents per liter), total alkalinity levels less than 20 milligrams per liter (mg/L), and total hardness concentrations below 25 mg/L, liming may be beneficial.
Permit applications and regulatory information usually are available from state water or natural resource agencies. Generally, the information required for a permit is similar to that needed for designing and defining the treatment, including (a) the proposed treatment material and application rate and (b) the data specific to that lake on baseline water quality, aquatic plants, and physical and hydrologic characteristics.
Liming may be harmful to naturally acidic wetlands (i.e., bogs, swamps, and marshes) and their associated acid-loving plants (sphagnum moss, black spruce, cranberry, leather leaf). Liming wetlands is not recommended because it can alter water chemistry, thereby permanently changing the plant and animal communities.
Public notification of the date, time, method of liming, and general precautions for recreational users is recommended on private lakes and typically required on public waters. Because liming may discolor the water temporarily, stimulate short-term algal blooms, and alter the taste and mineral content of drinking water, a pre-liming public education program is recommended when liming water-supply reservoirs.
Timber cutting and forest regrowth, building and road construction, and other types of land-use modifications can influence the acidity of surface waters. Land use changes can increase or decrease the acidity of lakes by altering the chemistry (acid-base ratios) within the watershed.
Liming surface waters neutralizes acidity and increases pH, alkalinity, and hardness to levels that encourage plankton and sport fish growth. Liming not only adds calcium, but releases absorbed elements (phosphorus and carbon) important to the growth and support of aquatic life.
Adding limestone and fertilizer are conventional fisheries management practices for enhancing sport fish production in ponds, even in those waters that are not impacted by acid. They should not be applied simultaneously because limestone may precipitate phosphorus and reduce its availability.
Acidified lakes and ponds can be restored by mitigative liming. The objective of mitigative liming is to restore and protect water quality and promote the recovery of aquatic life in acidified lakes and ponds. Applications of limestone on a sustained basis and the use of other fisheries management techniques, such as stocking, may be required to promote full recovery of lake resources.
Use high-quality, contaminant-free (< 5% of magnesium), and nutrient-free (low nitrates and phosphates) agricultural lime. Dolomitic limestone with high levels (> 5%) of magnesium carbonate (MgCO3) may result in poor dissolution and neutralization. However, because dolomitic limestone may be the only neutralizing material readily available in your locality, it is an acceptable alternative to aglime.
The calcium content of the limestone relates directly to its capacity to neutralize acidity. Calcium content should be > 70% (preferably 90-100%) CaCO3 by weight.
|Dolomite lime (MgCO3)||Impure|
|Hydrated lime (CaOH2)||Caustic|
|Soda ash (Na2CO3)||Expensive|
Hydrated lime (calcium hydroxide, Ca(OH)2) and quicklime (calcium oxide, Ca(OH)2) generally are not recommended for treating surface waters because they are corrosive, difficult to control, and may not be legal to apply. Hydrated lime and quicklime have been used for acid neutralization because less is needed (they have higher neutralizing values than pure limestone), but both are caustic.
Hydrated lime applications can kill fish at rates in excess of 50 pounds per surface acre. In fact, hydrated lime and quicklime often are used to disinfect ponds from fish parasites and to sterilize ponds prior to stocking fish. Hydrated lime contains about 54% calcium whereas quicklime contains about 71% calcium. Agricultural gypsum (calcium sulfate, CaSO4*2H20) is not a liming material.
Soda ash or sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) has been used infrequently to neutralize acidified surface waters. Soda ash is three to five times more expensive than limestone and does not contribute beneficial calcium ions.
Relatively inexpensive chemical test kits are available to measure pH and alkalinity levels. In most states, the Cooperative Extension Service and the Natural Resources Conservation Service can provide information on soil acidity. Calculating exactly how much limestone to add to neutralize an acidic lake is complicated by many factors, including:
After liming, the pH and alkalinity of waters should be monitored, especially during the summer, by taking surface samples on a weekly basis. If pH and total alkalinity of the lake water are low a month after the initial liming, the treatment should be repeated.
The addition of 500-3,000 pounds of limestone per surface acre should be sufficient to neutralize most lakes, but those with very acidic soils, low alkalinities, high concentrations of organic matter, and quick flushing rates may require greater dosages and more frequent treatments.
Reliming should occur whenever pH values drop below 6.5, total alkalinities drop below 10 mg/L. Maintaining the pH near neutral (pH 7) and total alkalinities > 20 mg/L will minimize stress to fish and prevent the bioaccumulation of toxic metals, such as mercury, in fish tissue.
Buy the smallest particle size of limestone available that is cost effective. The smaller the particle size, the better the rate of solution. Large limestone particles dissolve slowly. Finer limestone will cost more, but it generally is more cost-effective because greater amounts go into solution. Pulverized limestone particles that pass through a 200-mesh screen and are about 1 5-20 microns (0.00059-0.000079 inches) in size are ideal for liming lakes.
Generally, it is easier to handle, transport, and distribute bagged limestone. Volunteers can more easily lift and load bags of limestone from the shoreline staging area (boat dock) onto boats and barges for distribution. Stockpile limestone near the dock area to minimize handling time. Cover bagged limestone with plastic for rain protection if the application period is prolonged. Bulk limestone is much cheaper to buy, but requires special equipment to transport, unload, and distribute quickly and evenly.
Application from a boat or barge is the most popular way to treat lakes and ponds. Shoveling limestone into the wake (prop wash) of a moving powerboat is a simple and cheap distribution method. Flushing limestone from a moving barge platform with a high pressure water hose is an alternative broadcast method that promotes dissolution of the limestone.
Using an on-board slurry box to mix the limestone and water solution before pumping the mixture into the lake helps ensure better solution and circulation. Applying limestone as a wet slurry increases its dissolution efficiency by 25% when compared to its application as a dry dust on the water or on surface ice in winter.
Spreading limestone by snowmobile, tractor/spreader, or truck directly on ice-covered lakes is a relatively easy and economical method to use in the northern U.S. where surface ice is prevalent in winter and thick enough to support heavy, loaded vehicles. At spring icemelt, the limestone dissolves with the surface ice and is distributed evenly into the lake.
Limestone applied by helicopter, truck, or hand within the lake watershed (lawns, fields, and forests) eventually will wash into the lake. Treatments can be applied to water pathways such as wetlands, headwater springs, tributaries, and other sources of water discharge.
Generally, watershed treatment is more expensive than direct lake application. The average cost of direct pond application is only about 20% of the cost of one average watershed treatment. However, watershed treatment may provide sustained neutralization. Watershed liming has been effective on small lakes with small tributaries. Reliable, easily implemented procedures for treating watersheds are not yet widely available in the U.S.
Limestone application by aircraft may be necessary on very large or remote lakes and ponds where road access and ground transportation are not available. This technique is expensive (often 4 times the cost of boat delivery methods).
Limestone should be spread over (blanketing) the entire lake surface. Areas of deep water have greater volumes and will require proportionally greater amounts of limestone. Consult a hydrographic (depth) map to determine dosage rates and limestone placement.
Much of the total cost of liming a lake or pond is attributed to transport, labor, and the application equipment. Of course, the more acidic the lake, the greater the amount of limestone required and the greater the cost of treatment. Moreover, complete restoration to the original pH and the maintenance of self-reproducing (rather than stocked) fish populations may require repeated treatments.
Annual treatments are more expensive than a single treatment, but the costs can be spread over many years. Annual treatments allow smaller dosages than the recommended rate of 1-2 tons/acre to be applied. For example, after the initial dose, smaller doses, usually 25% of the initial application rate, can be applied over 4 years.
Liming during the summer months may disrupt recreational activities and temporarily diminish water clarity, resulting in public inconvenience and displeasure. Additionally, the limestone may not be evenly mixed throughout the water column during the summer.
The effects of liming on fish populations and aquatic life usually are slow and subtle. If an adequate number of adult spawning fish remain in an acidified lake, natural reproductive success may restore fish populations. Liming improves the survival of fish eggs and developing embryos, which are particularly sensitive to acidification. By stimulating the growth of plankton populations, liming provides prey items for young sport and forage fish.
Liming has been used for over a century to enable acidified and naturally acidic surface waters to support more productive fisheries. The objectives of protection and restoration of recreational fisheries can be achieved with a higher degree of certainty and rapidity by liming than by relying solely on emission controls limiting the release of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NO2). Even when emission controls are in place, liming achieves short-term fishery improvements until the controls are effective in reversing acidification processes in surface waters.
Fraser, J. E. and D. L. Britt. 1982. Liming of Acidified Waters: A Review of Methods and Effects on Aquatic Ecosystems. FWS/OBS8040.13. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Kearneysville, WV.
Gloss, S. P., C. L. Schofield, and M. D. Marcus. 1989. Liming and Fisheries Management Guidelines for Acidified Lakes in the Adirondack Region. Rep 80(40.27). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Kearneysville, WV.
Olem, H. 1991. Liming Acidic Surface Waters. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI.
Olem, H., R. K. Schreider, R.W. Brocksen, and D.B. Porcella. 1991. International Lake and Watershed Liming Practices. Terrene Institute, Washington, D. C.
The U.S. National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program: 1990 Integrated Assessment Report. 1991. The NAPAP Office of the Director, 722 Jackson Place, NW, Washington, D.C.
Reviewed by Michelle Davis, Research Associate, Fisheries and Wildlife
Virginia Cooperative Extension materials are available for public use, re-print, or citation without further permission, provided the use includes credit to the author and to Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, and Virginia State University.
Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia State University, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating. Alan L. Grant, Dean, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences; Edwin J. Jones, Director, Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg; Jewel E. Hairston, Administrator, 1890 Extension Program, Virginia State, Petersburg.
May 1, 2009